The COMPACS® system
Real-time vibration diagnostics
of machinery with probability close to 1
Русский Русский     EnglishEnglish 
Menu
Home
Products
Customers & responses
Personnel training
About company
News
Publications
Contacts
Awards
  • 2016 "Russia’s Honoured Engineer"
  • 2016 "Recognition"
  • 2016 "Import Substitution"
  • 2016 "Innovations and Quality"
  • 2015 "Outstanding manager"
  • 2015 "100 best goods of Russia"
  • 2015 "ESQR’s Quality Achievements Awards"
  • 2014 "Best Quality of Rolling Stock and Complex Technical Systems Contest conducted by Russian Railways"
  • 2014 "Highly-efficient  company"
  • 2014 "Reliable supplier"
  • 2014 "Leader of the Industry"
  • 2014 "Accountant of the Year"
  • 2014 "Technological breakthrough"
  • 2013 "Business elite of Russia"
  • 2013 "Top 100 of Russian Goods"
Tags Cloud
Follow us
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Google+ RSS
Certification
In 2001 the quality management system of SPC Dynamics was put through facultative certification. In 2016 it was recertified for compliance with standards ISO 9001:2008. Its results confirmed a high level of goods and services quality management. In 2001 the quality management system of SPC Dynamics was put through facultative certification. In 2016 it was recertified for compliance with standard GOST ISO 9001-2011. Its results confirmed a high level of goods and services quality management.
Orphus system
Home Publications Articles Risk Evaluation for FPC Facilities Condition Monitoring

Risk Evaluation for FPC Facilities Condition Monitoring

Print

The article examines the features for evaluation of class of a monitoring system for production and transportation purposes, shows a necessity of meticulous consideration of factors correlation and inner classification in order to determine the power industry facilities liable to the particular diagnostic and monitoring systems.

The article specifies the criteria for classification of facilities targeted by technical regulation, hazardous production facilities, critically important facilities and strategically important facilities.

The author shows a significant impact of type 1 error of machinery condition static recognition on type 1 dynamic recognition error, which is developing in inverse relation to decrease of ratio of diagnostic signs critical values (“Unacceptable” and “Actions required” conditions).

It is shown in the article, that implementation of diagnostic and monitoring systems is advisable even in case of high risk of failure skipping, since when the risk to skip a failure is more than 30% - time of accident-free operation of hazardous production facilities increases not more than twice.

 

Kostyukov V.N., Boychenko S.N., Naumenko A.P., Kostyukov An.V., Kostyukov Al.V. Risk Evaluation for FPC Facilities Condition Monitoring // Problems of vibration, vibration alignment, vibration monitoring and diagnostics of power stations: proceedings of the VIII International Scientific Conference - Moscow, JSC "VTI", 2013. – p. 225-235

Download the publication

You can order the translation by e-mail: a@dynamics.ru


Tags: condition monitoring diagnostics vibration analysis technical condition hazardous production facilities Date: 16.09.2016
Views: 513
« Prev. Next. »