The COMPACS® system
Real-time vibration diagnostics
of machinery with probability close to 1
Русский Русский     EnglishEnglish 
Menu
Home
Products
Customers & responses
Personnel training
About company
News
Publications
Contacts
Awards
  • 2016 "Russia’s Honoured Engineer"
  • 2016 "Recognition"
  • 2016 "Import Substitution"
  • 2016 "Innovations and Quality"
  • 2015 "Outstanding manager"
  • 2015 "100 best goods of Russia"
  • 2015 "ESQR’s Quality Achievements Awards"
  • 2014 "Best Quality of Rolling Stock and Complex Technical Systems Contest conducted by Russian Railways"
  • 2014 "Highly-efficient  company"
  • 2014 "Reliable supplier"
  • 2014 "Leader of the Industry"
  • 2014 "Accountant of the Year"
  • 2014 "Technological breakthrough"
  • 2013 "Business elite of Russia"
  • 2013 "Top 100 of Russian Goods"
Tags Cloud
Follow us
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Google+ RSS
Certification
In 2001 the quality management system of SPC Dynamics was put through facultative certification. In 2016 it was recertified for compliance with standards ISO 9001:2008. Its results confirmed a high level of goods and services quality management. In 2001 the quality management system of SPC Dynamics was put through facultative certification. In 2016 it was recertified for compliance with standard GOST ISO 9001-2011. Its results confirmed a high level of goods and services quality management.
Orphus system
Home Publications Articles Risk assessment for establishing standard values of diagnostic features

Risk assessment for establishing standard values of diagnostic features

Print

In general case, using a combination of diagnostic features, with each feature characterizing the diagnostic object’s condition with a certain probability, it would be correct to establish a critical rule by which the combination of features would be considered to be related to one of the possible states (diagnoses). In particular case, it is important to distinguish two diagnoses (differential diagnostics or dichotomy), such as “good condition” and “faulty condition”.

Methods of statistics decisions, such as minimal risk method, minimal faulty decision method, minimax method, Neumann-Pearson method, maximum likelihood method allow to choose the critical rule using optimum conditions, such as minimum risk condition, reducing chance of a diagnostic error at a set level of another error.

The paper considers selection of a method for establishing standard values of diagnostic features using a theory of statistic decisions-making. The paper dwells upon calculation of probability of defect skipping and false alarm, as well as failure skipping risk while establishing a standard feature value by various methods of decision-making.

 

Kostyukov V.N., Naumenko A.P. Risk assessment for establishing standard values of diagnostic features // Dinamika sistem, mehanizmov i mashin (Dynamics of systems, mechanisms and machines). - Omsk: OmSTU, 2014. - Iss. 4. - p. 150-154.

Download the publication

You can order the translation by e-mail: a@dynamics.ru


Tags: condition monitoring diagnostics vibration analysis non-destructive testing diagnostic features machinery Date: 26.09.2017
Views: 117
« Prev. Next. »